Layout Page Search
Return a compact set of pages supporting a question within its specified document.
- Domain
document evidence pages- Primary focus
Layout Page Search- Primary metric
EvidencePageSetF1
On this page
Runtime and requirements
- Agent budget:
6 hours - Compute:
8CPUs,32 GiBRAM,100 GiBstorage;1GPU(s)
Build: 3,600 seconds. Up to 600 requests in two calls, each allowed 2,700 seconds. Encoders remain fixed; an optional component may have at most five million trainable parameters and 45 minutes of training. At most 40 pages per request may undergo query-dependent token, region or learned pairwise scoring. No external APIs or data.
Public input and output contract
Inputs
Page records, rendered images and extracted Markdown are in /task/data/corpus/; local page/vision models are in /task/models/. Requests provide query_id, doc_id, question, domain and language. Public requests and labels are under /task/data/validation/.
Outputs
Submit executable /app/build.sh and /app/run.sh and all supporting files under /app. The fresh verifier rebuilds the index and runs commands as a non-root user with code and inputs read-only. Honor the supplied index, output, TMPDIR and cache paths; the index parent is not writable.
/app/build.sh --corpus /task/data/corpus --index-dir /work/index
/app/run.sh --index-dir /work/index --queries /path/to/queries.jsonl --output /path/to/results.jsonl
Return query_id and at most ten distinct page_id/finite score results from the specified document, in nonincreasing score order. No answer or bounding box is required.
The index remains writable across repeated query calls.
Evaluation
For each question, compute set F1 between the returned pages and the complete original evidence-page set. Quality is mean F1 over 515 held-out questions. Domain means are diagnostic.
The set metric penalizes both missing evidence and extra pages. Returning the complete annotated evidence set achieves full per-query credit. It does not measure answer accuracy or bounding-box localization.
Reward mapping
The final reward uses the raw quality described above, with fixed reference quality b = 0.5734305608092015 and integer score anchor a = 20 on the 0–100 scale:
reward(q) = (a / 100) * q / b if 0 <= q <= b
a / 100 + (1 - a / 100) * (q - b) / (1 - b) if b < q <= 1
This maps raw quality 0, b and 1 to rewards 0, a / 100 and 1. Raw quality and auxiliary diagnostics are reported separately. Harbor retains the 0–1 reward precision; a displayed 0–100 score is rounded to one decimal place. Correctness and trajectory-audit gates take precedence over this conversion.
Validity and failure handling
The verifier checks successful index construction, executable behavior, query coverage, IDs, duplicate handling, finite scores and stage limits. Completed valid JSONL rows remain usable after a query timeout; missing or invalid rows score zero. A non-timeout query-command failure invalidates that call. See instruction.md and the verifier for the exact task-specific validity checks.
Final reward requires a healthy, accepting independent trajectory and submission integrity audit. Audit failures are reported separately from retrieval quality and cannot produce positive credit.
See the full instructions, task documentation and runtime configuration for the complete contract at the synchronized benchmark revision.